State of Arizona Board of Technical Registration: State government office in Phoenix, AZ

The service provider, as administrator of the site, does not verify whether the opinions published on the site come from consumers who have purchased or used the product or service in question. The rating in stars (up to 5) is the arithmetic average of all ratings given within the reviews published below.

• Lolly

  • 5,0
  • Add opinion

  Honestly, that board meeting left me pretty concerned about buying a house in Arizona. It seems they’re focusing on public building problems that really shouldn’t be a major factor for homebuyers. report abuse

• Capone Machuca

  • 5,0
  • Add opinion

  It’s clear the current board isn’t prioritizing consumer protection. Recent decisions have seemed driven by personal viewpoints rather than objective facts, which raises serious concerns. report abuse

• Daniel Lewis

  • 5,0
  • Add opinion

  “I learned about this group quite unexpectedly – I discovered them while observing a meeting focused on a complaint about home inspector, Cy Porter, and his conduct.” report abuse

• Jason Holmes

  • 5,0
  • Add opinion

  “The Arizona Board of Technical Registration seems to have displayed a concerning bias towards builders, despite concerns raised by their own members. A recent hearing indicated no rule violations, yet the board ultimately sided with the builders in a multi-billion dollar case.” report abuse

• Mel Lyn

  • 5,0
  • Add opinion

  I’m incredibly disappointed with the service I’ve received. As a homeowner currently building a house in Arizona, I was relying on you to protect my interests, but instead, you’ve done the exact opposite. report abuse

• Janet F

  • 5,0
  • Add opinion

  Mr. Porter is doing a valuable job, and it’s frustrating to see his efforts undermined. It’s clear that quality construction is the real issue here – if builders prioritized building well and inspectors weren’t constantly having to address substandard work, this situation wouldn’t exist. report abuse

• Jacob Pfaff

  • 5,0
  • Add opinion

  Honestly, I was really disappointed with the board’s decision to send a Letter of Concern after that meeting about Mr. Porter. It’s frustrating for builders when inspectors are overly critical, but given the situation with Mr. Porter… report abuse

• Michael Gonczi

  • 5,0
  • Add opinion

  I’m deeply concerned about the board’s recent decisions. It feels like they’ve prioritized the interests of the developers over the safety and well-being of the community. Their actions regarding these potentially dangerous homes are incredibly troubling, and frankly, I believe they need to seriously reconsider their approach. Ms. Skankey clearly has a valuable perspective and a strong commitment to protecting residents, and it’s disheartening to see her expertise seemingly disregarded. report abuse

• Robert Billman

  • 5,0
  • Add opinion

  This appears to be a deeply frustrated and frankly, hostile, assessment. It suggests a complete lack of trust in the organization's stated purpose, with a primary concern being that their actions prioritize financial gain over the well-being of those they claim to serve. report abuse

• T J

  • 5,0
  • Add opinion

  I was deeply concerned by the board’s recent decision, particularly the way it seemed to prioritize the interests of building companies over the safety of homeowners. It’s unacceptable that members would support practices that could potentially put people at risk, and I believe a thorough review of their actions and motivations is warranted. We need to ensure accountability and transparency within the board to rebuild trust. report abuse