State of Arizona Board of Technical Registration: State government office in Phoenix, AZ

The service provider, as administrator of the site, does not verify whether the opinions published on the site come from consumers who have purchased or used the product or service in question. The rating in stars (up to 5) is the arithmetic average of all ratings given within the reviews published below.

• Lolly

  • 5,0
  • Add opinion

  Okay, here’s a natural-sounding rewrite of that evaluation: “After seeing the recent board meeting, I have to say I’m not feeling optimistic about buying a house in Arizona. It seems like they’re focusing on some building issues that should be a much bigger priority – issues that really need to cause concern.” report abuse

• Capone Machuca

  • 5,0
  • Add opinion

  “It’s clear the current board isn’t prioritizing consumer protection. Recent decisions have seemed driven more by individual viewpoints and ego than by factual evidence, which is concerning.” report abuse

• Daniel Lewis

  • 5,0
  • Add opinion

  “I was really surprised to learn about this group – it all started when I attended a meeting where they were voicing concerns about Cy Porter’s conduct as a home inspector. It was quite eye-opening.” report abuse

• Jason Holmes

  • 5,0
  • Add opinion

  “The Arizona Board of Technical Registration’s handling of this case raises serious concerns. It appears they’ve demonstrated a clear bias towards builders, despite their own members acknowledging no rule violations during a recent hearing. The decision to support a multi-billion dollar project, even with these findings, is troubling and warrants further investigation.” report abuse

• Mel Lyn

  • 5,0
  • Add opinion

  I’m incredibly frustrated with the service I’ve received. As someone building a new home in Arizona, I was relying on these people to protect my interests as a buyer, but instead, they’ve completely let me down. report abuse

• Janet F

  • 5,0
  • Add opinion

  “Mr. Porter is doing a really important job, and I genuinely believe he’s handling it correctly. It’s frustrating to see some of the construction quality issues, and I think it really comes down to the builders and the city inspectors working together effectively. If we saw a higher standard of building, then Mr. Porter wouldn’t have to constantly flag up the problems.” report abuse

• Jacob Pfaff

  • 5,0
  • Add opinion

  Honestly, I was really disappointed with the board’s decision to send a Letter of Concern regarding Mr. Porter. It's definitely frustrating for builders when inspectors are overly critical, but in this case, it felt a bit excessive. report abuse

• Michael Gonczi

  • 5,0
  • Add opinion

  “I’m incredibly disappointed with the board’s actions. It seems they’ve prioritized the interests of the developers over the safety and well-being of the public. The current situation is concerning, and it’s clear a different perspective is needed – someone like Ms. Skankey, who seems to genuinely care about ensuring homes are built to safe standards.” report abuse

• Robert Billman

  • 5,0
  • Add opinion

  This seems to be a deeply frustrated and critical assessment, suggesting a fundamental betrayal of trust. It's clear the reviewer feels those in charge are prioritizing self-interest over the well-being of the people they’re supposed to be safeguarding. report abuse

• T J

  • 5,0
  • Add opinion

  “It’s deeply concerning to see the board prioritize the interests of building companies over the safety of homeowners. There needs to be a thorough review of the board’s decisions and a clear understanding of how members are ensuring responsible building practices. This situation raises serious questions about accountability and transparency.” report abuse